Logical mistakes in SHC.

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
51 messages Options
123
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

[>D-F<]~T-Bag~
Vika are you still play stronghold kingdoms?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

~Vika~
No, I stopped it few months ago, it was too boring for me.
Anyway...the game seems for many to be good.

But one point I can't understand... in Kingdoms there are also firefly people playing it and solving bugs etc, they really care about it, thats ok cuz it's mmo, but... was FF ever interested to know what happen to shc online? I mean, to know what is possible in this game when you attack with few swordsman more than cpu does? I've always wondered about it, cuz only if you play, play with experts, not hear opinion of hundreds of noobs like "I love this game" then probably shce would be never released and some bugs solved.

I know, you can't answer me that... lol
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

[>D-F<]~T-Bag~
For as Firefly interes in shc, there was some minor interese, Merlin was making new program, something like GSA, and Firefly was going to support it, but that project is on waiting, or even dead. as for other question I didn't get it, but if you are asking why players swordsman are stronger then cpu swordsman it's cuz players can research swordsman power, and cpu siege camps are at lowest, and rat/snake(pig/wolf got stronger then ai siege camps, but lower then max researched players swordsman.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

~Vika~
Yes yes, you right, but forget swordsmen, ...I wrote chaotic lol.

The meaning was if firefly would care about shc and know problems/wishes same way like in kingdoms (by playing it online with experts) then they could make shc better too (kinda like we wish). Bugs, lags, bigger maps, w/e, there was more possible to do later than Extreme with useless effects or 1.3. Who needs that.
But seems firefly was focused only on singleplayer modus... poor shc compared to shk :/

Well,  gone a bit offtopic :D
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

[>D-F<]~T-Bag~
oh yeah, you are right, they might do such a better thing, to bad they didn't and probably never will :(
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

[>D-F<]~Dingo
In reply to this post by ~Vika~
they can make money from shk, but they can't make any money from shc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

~Vika~
Yes and No

Yes : Shk had 4 alphas to see how this game is playable, I was in a3 3 years ago too, the final shk is result of firefly ideas + experience from tests with players. Bugs solved, some ideas were from players also, thats ok, isn't it? Fun for players = money for ff and all happy.

No : Wait few months...shc2 will come to us, and not for free for sure :p
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

Muri3ta
Oh yea, I totally forgot about shc2, but I'm affraid they will late with realising it, and I'm kinda pesimistic about how good will that game be :(
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

!Yu.GoD!GILMAN
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by [>D-F<]~T-Bag~
Program is named "shcvillagesquare" a.k.a. V.S.=villagesquare
Yeah T-Bag,you have a right one information,Firefly gonna support it,if we finish this project.
And No,project isnt dead,unfortunatly,I'm only one who is nowadays and recently at lobby of VS,along with autobot sometimes.For those who doesnt know autobot is a bot who is kicking all who cheat or use bad words :) I hear that Merlin asked Mokka to host his tournament in VS and he will provide Firefly support also,but idk why that isnt futfilled.
We keeping developing it,even some of guys are on holidays,vacations etc :) So,dont worry,it will be finished,soon on later...Cheers...
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

[>D-F<]~Dingo
thanks a lot gilman for killing a perfectly good discussion
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Logical mistakes in SHC.

!Yu.GoD!GILMAN
That wasnt my aim with that reply...I just wanted people in this community know a little more about rumors that is circulate around...Who wanna  and who is interesed will read,who isnt will pass it...
123