Eh your ss is a little better, but i didn't make knights and he did... But anyway, i dont really care to play you. There isn't any way you could be a top expert and I wouldn't know you, so depending on who you are I'll waste time owning you.
Re: I challenge all "top-experts" from the list of HL
Dangerfield when have you ever played me in no fs? People think that because I hate no fs that I am bad at it. I can own people in No FS too, but it takes way longer and its more boring. DH was always thinking he was really good in No fs, but I always owned him. Lusenrad is good in no fs, but I have beaten him in it too. Same with feanor, although feanor has beaten me in no fs before, and our last no fs game we decided was a tie. (well me and oxapam did atleast)
I can't play for fun in no fs, I can only play for the win. So that probably makes me even harder to beat in no fs :-(
Re: I challenge all "top-experts" from the list of HL
People u named arent good in nofs. Only fena is. Others just make 100500 has. Its noobish tactick and it can be beaten easily.
If u say u can beat me in no fs - no problem we can try. If now u say that u wont play with noob - u r a bragger
Ares said "when u get in u go only for king :/ top experk dont play only for kill king. First kill army.. " , LMAO!!!!!!!!! that coming from one xcon , the clan that doesn't know what playing for fun means, and what fun games are!!! KILL YOUR SELF PATHETIC RETARD
P.S.
Stop cheating, and then start talking, keks pwned you lmao
well feanor, of my SS of you i'm not sure which of them are no fs and which are fs. But you remember in the last game we played for a long time, we didn't think it would ever end, and you were asking to end it but i wanted to keep going. I ended up fucking up and you won, but that crash was stupid, but whatever. 1v1 in no fs you could win or i could win, it can go either way, it's just a waste of 2 hours.
keks isn't so good, he is just a camper and when he gets big army he goes out with ha, shields, pikemen,sins and knights all mixed. The only thing you need to beat keks is just to don't let him to be host.
By the way, I challenge keks to play 1 v 1 (3 matches) in all different rules.
Dingo you beat me only once at no fs and i beat you only once at no fire only and i am not bragging about that because it tells nothing and you know well because i challenged you to play again in no fs and you refused. However, when you lost to me in no fire only and you asked for rm i acepted. So don't say that you don't give a fuck if you win or lose and that you just play for fun like you said when you lost 10 times vs Geralt.
You won't play me again at no fs even if i challenge you 1 million times more because you know well in that no fs game you won due to my mistakes not because of your skills and you know exactly what i mean. Peace.
Re: I challenge all "top-experts" from the list of HL
No shit lusenrad, NO FS is so easy that even a failure of a medium expert like you can play on the same level as a top expert. The game goes until someone makes a mistake, and the winner is the one who can go longer without making a mistake. I don't understand how "I made a mistake and that's why you won" is an excuse, because in no fs, 90% of the time you only lose from making mistakes. Since no fs is all you play, I would have thought that you would've known that. I don't give you a rm in no fs because I don't see any point. I already know that it's possible for the game to go both ways, i could win but you could also win. It doesn't really prove a bunch, except that we enjoy wasting 2 hours sitting and watching our 500 ha and 500 shields shoot arrows at eachother. Whereas in no fire only, it can't go both ways, it's more fast paced, and it isn't totally boring:)