Re: The Proofs of my Superiority

Posted by [>D-F<]~Dingo on
URL: http://the-best-of-crusader.24.s1.nabble.com/The-Proofs-of-my-Superiority-tp7580120p7580289.html

I really care very little of your opinion. I doubt you were actually too attentive of my skill or anybody elses over the last few years. First of all, about what Unframed said about Geralt. This'll all come off as an excuse, but whatever. For starters, Geralt came during a time when i was just always fucking around in game and didn't even really care if I lost. FIrst few games we played I didn't take him serious, didn't even make any army until he was already outside of my walls. THis was early 2011, and during that time I was just fucking around, and really i never was playing serious again or since then. He beat me about 7 times in a row, which was really weird because I was used to owning people without even trying. Then I got really determined and i started winning some games, but still. Me and him played about 20 games, and we're probably like 12-8 in his favor, but when I was playing really serious I still felt like I was better than him.

 Disagree with me or not, I think geralt was very good, and actually he's one of only a handful of players that came after me that I respected. I respected how he played, I felt like he played very similar to me, I just kind of thought he was a slightly lower version of me, but actually pretty close.

As for Erec, I think Erec played very good too. He learned some of his best tricks from me, but he was also a very aggressive and dangerous when he was at his peak. He was also very good and dangerous to play, but still I don't feel bad saying I was also better than him.

As for what you said Venom, if you think it or not I don't give a fuck, but at my best I was very skilled. Even when I hardly play I still play with a lot of skill and intelligence that I don't see in many other players these days. I'd be willing to settle for second place to holylord, but that's the most ground as I'd be willing to give up.