Re: Mass Cats and Monks - The Truth

Posted by [>D-F<]~Dingo~ on
URL: http://the-best-of-crusader.24.s1.nabble.com/Mass-Cats-and-Monks-The-Truth-tp5996722p5996908.html

Of course Holylord agrees with you, hes pissed at me so he'll disagree with me on anything I say. But Holylord's opinion is stupid, so nobody should pay any attention to his stupid opinion.


Ares, just tell me, when people win from using that tactic, how much of it is them and how much is it the tactic? Are they winning because they're skilled? Or are they winning because they're using a stronger tactic? Just like skill varies, so does the strength of a tactic. If you had a highly skilled player who chose to try to win without making mass cats and mass monks vs somebody who was using mass cats and mass monks who wasn't a complete push over, then the "highly skilled" player would have great difficulty taking the other guy's army down, and even if he managed to do it it probably wouldn't be a consistent method that he could rely on, and it would be pretty much just a gamble for him. Yes you could argue that a skilled player chooses the stronger tactic, but mass cats and mass monks is a tactic that any noob can manage, and the only smart and consistent way to take it down is by matching it with more cats and more monks.